Competitor profile

SAJI A KURUVILLA

They win 11% of what they bid, and 2% of the value they chase.

19tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
15 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
19
19 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
16 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.4 L
of ₹6.8 Cr bid — 1.5% conversion
Win rate
10.5%
of 19 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count19 bids
10.5%
84.2%
Awarded210.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected15.3%
Lost1684.2%
By value₹6.8 Cr
97.4%
Awarded₹10.4 L1.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.2 L1.1%
Lost₹6.6 Cr97.4%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹10.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Sabu A Kuruvila4 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹12.2 L
won head-to-head
02
kjthomas1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹95.8 L
won head-to-head
03
ANOOP THOMAS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹17.1 L
won head-to-head
04
SYAM P S1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹7.2 L
won head-to-head
05
MINITEK CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹7.2 L
won head-to-head
06
Joji Joseph1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹18.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSAJI A KURUVILLA awardedOthers

About SAJI A KURUVILLA

SAJI A KURUVILLA appears as a bidder on 19 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 19 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 10.5% win rate — worth ₹10.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 65.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Sabu A Kuruvila, kjthomas and ANOOP THOMAS. Sabu A Kuruvila bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; SAJI A KURUVILLA won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.