Competitor profile

ANOOP THOMAS

They win 25% of what they bid, and 31% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
20 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹18.2 L
of ₹59.1 L bid — 30.7% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count8 bids
25.0%
75.0%
Awarded225.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost675.0%
By value₹59.1 L
30.7%
69.3%
Awarded₹18.2 L30.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹40.9 L69.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Irrigation Department₹18.2 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹18.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Xavier Oommen2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹10.9 L
won head-to-head
02
SAJI A KURUVILLA0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SYAM P S0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MINITEK CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹7.2 L
won head-to-head
05
ANIL V VARGHESE1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹6.3 L
won head-to-head
06
Thomas Chacko1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedANOOP THOMAS awardedOthers

About ANOOP THOMAS

ANOOP THOMAS appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹18.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Irrigation Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Xavier Oommen, SAJI A KURUVILLA and SYAM P S. Xavier Oommen bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; ANOOP THOMAS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.