Competitor profile

Sajad Ahmed

They win 20% of what they bid, but only 10% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

5tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
26 Mar 2025last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹8.4 L
of ₹85.4 L bid — 9.8% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
20.0%
60.0%
20.0%
Awarded120.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected360.0%
Lost120.0%
By value₹85.4 L
84.8%
Awarded₹8.4 L9.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹72.4 L84.8%
Lost₹4.7 L5.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SUNIL SHARMA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹4.4 L
won head-to-head
02
BALJEET SINGH THAKUR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
RAVINDER KUMAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
AJAY SHARMA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RAJINDER SINGH VERMA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
DEEPAK BUTAIL1 win · 1 shared tender
₹11.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSajad Ahmed awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Sajad Ahmed

About Sajad Ahmed

Sajad Ahmed appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹8.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Mar 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Municipal Corporation Shimla, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SUNIL SHARMA, BALJEET SINGH THAKUR and RAVINDER KUMAR. SUNIL SHARMA bid on 1 of the same tender and won 1 of them; Sajad Ahmed won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.