Competitor profile

SAAR TECHNOLOGIES

They win 15% of what they bid, and 14% of the value they chase.

88tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
21 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
88
88 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
13
65 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹98.7 L
of ₹6.9 Cr bid — 14.3% conversion
Win rate
14.8%
of 88 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count88 bids
14.8%
11.4%
73.9%
Awarded1314.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1011.4%
Lost6573.9%
By value₹6.9 Cr
14.3%
78.8%
Awarded₹98.7 L14.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹47.5 L6.9%
Lost₹5.4 Cr78.8%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Chandigarh₹98.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Hipath Technologies50 wins · 64 shared tenders
₹146.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
PRABH KIRPA ENTERPRISES6 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹27.3 L
won head-to-head
03
VENUS ELECTRICALS1 win · 17 shared tenders
₹2.7 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S Vikram Electricals1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹1.7 L
won head-to-head
05
VIKRAM INFRA0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Online Communication0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSAAR TECHNOLOGIES awardedOthers

About SAAR TECHNOLOGIES

SAAR TECHNOLOGIES appears as a bidder on 88 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 88 decided bids, it was awarded 13 — a 14.8% win rate — worth ₹98.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Administration, at 52.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Hipath Technologies, PRABH KIRPA ENTERPRISES and VENUS ELECTRICALS. Hipath Technologies bid on 64 of the same tenders and won 50 of them; SAAR TECHNOLOGIES won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.