Competitor profile

Hipath Technologies

They win 67% of what they bid — and 97% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

129tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
21 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
129
129 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
87
28 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹150.3 Cr
of ₹154.5 Cr bid — 97.3% conversion
Win rate
67.4%
of 129 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count129 bids
67.4%
10.9%
21.7%
Awarded8767.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1410.9%
Lost2821.7%
By value₹154.5 Cr
97.3%
Awarded₹150.3 Cr97.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.6 Cr1.0%
Lost₹2.7 Cr1.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Chandigarh Administration₹150.3 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Chandigarh₹150.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAAR TECHNOLOGIES7 wins · 64 shared tenders
₹29.6 L
won head-to-head
02
PRABH KIRPA ENTERPRISES5 wins · 38 shared tenders
₹44.5 L
won head-to-head
03
VENUS ELECTRICALS0 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Shanti Infotech10 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹44.9 L
won head-to-head
05
Online Communication0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Telenet marketing pvt Ltd.5 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedHipath Technologies awardedOthers

About Hipath Technologies

Hipath Technologies appears as a bidder on 129 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 129 decided bids, it was awarded 87 — a 67.4% win rate — worth ₹150.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SAAR TECHNOLOGIES, PRABH KIRPA ENTERPRISES and VENUS ELECTRICALS. SAAR TECHNOLOGIES bid on 64 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; Hipath Technologies won 50.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.