Competitor profile

S3 Technology

They win 10% of what they bid, and 4% of the value they chase.

11tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
17 Sept 2024last award
Total bids
10
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.9 L
of ₹1.6 Cr bid — 3.7% conversion
Win rate
10.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
10.0%
20.0%
70.0%
Awarded110.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected220.0%
Lost770.0%
By value₹1.6 Cr
24.7%
71.6%
Awarded₹5.9 L3.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹39.3 L24.7%
Lost₹1.1 Cr71.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry₹5.9 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Himachal Pradesh₹5.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAJEEV KUMAR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Saddam Engineering1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹22.9 L
won head-to-head
03
shashikant0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
rajneesh katna0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Himachal Agro Seeds and Pesticides0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MJM CONSULTANT PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedS3 Technology awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to S3 Technology

About S3 Technology

S3 Technology appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 10.0% win rate — worth ₹5.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Sept 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAJEEV KUMAR, Saddam Engineering and shashikant. RAJEEV KUMAR bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; S3 Technology won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.