Competitor profile

Saddam Engineering

They win 27% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

23tenders on record
7buyer authorities
1state
7 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
22
23 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
14 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹46.3 L
of ₹2.5 Cr bid — 18.5% conversion
Win rate
27.3%
of 22 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count22 bids
27.3%
63.6%
Awarded627.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected29.1%
Lost1463.6%
By value₹2.5 Cr
18.5%
72.7%
Awarded₹46.3 L18.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹22.1 L8.8%
Lost₹1.8 Cr72.7%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
DINESH KUMAR GUPTA0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Islam1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹1.4 L
won head-to-head
03
rakesh0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
praveen kumar bhatia0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Ashwani kumar0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RAMNIK THAKUR0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSaddam Engineering awardedOthers

About Saddam Engineering

Saddam Engineering appears as a bidder on 23 government tenders on record, from 7 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 22 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 27.3% win rate — worth ₹46.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, at 49.5% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against DINESH KUMAR GUPTA, Islam and rakesh. DINESH KUMAR GUPTA bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Saddam Engineering won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.