Competitor profile

M/s S.T. Construction

They win 60% of what they bid, but only 43% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
30 Jan 2026last award
Total bids
5
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.4 Cr
of ₹5.5 Cr bid — 43.4% conversion
Win rate
60.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
60.0%
40.0%
Awarded360.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected240.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹5.5 Cr
43.4%
56.6%
Awarded₹2.4 Cr43.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.1 Cr56.6%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹2.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s S.R. Enterprise1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹22.0 L
won head-to-head
02
LAKHI CHUTIA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
03
Sri Manoj Konwar1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
04
BABU DCHAMUAH1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1
won head-to-head
05
ASHIM MAHANTA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1
won head-to-head
06
Arunmoni Phukan1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1
won head-to-head
Rival awardedS.T. Construction awardedOthers

About M/s S.T. Construction

M/s S.T. Construction appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 60.0% win rate — worth ₹2.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Jan 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Roads Department, at 79.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/s S.R. Enterprise, LAKHI CHUTIA and Sri Manoj Konwar. M/s S.R. Enterprise bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/s S.T. Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.