Competitor profile

S.M. ENTERPRISES

They win 45% of what they bid, and 36% of the value they chase.

50tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
1 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
49
50 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
22
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.0 Cr
of ₹11.3 Cr bid — 35.6% conversion
Win rate
44.9%
of 49 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count49 bids
44.9%
16.3%
38.8%
Awarded2244.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected816.3%
Lost1938.8%
By value₹11.3 Cr
35.7%
19.3%
45.1%
Awarded₹4.0 Cr35.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.2 Cr19.3%
Lost₹5.1 Cr45.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Haryana Government₹1.9 Cr46.8%

Operating states

LowHigh
Haryana₹4.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Eloquence Services4 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹38.4 L
won head-to-head
02
GAURAV KUMAR0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
RAJIV1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹4.4 L
won head-to-head
04
Shobha Enterprises1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹78.7 L
won head-to-head
05
GARIMA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SIDHI VINAYAK ENTERPRISES1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹75.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedS.M. ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About S.M. ENTERPRISES

S.M. ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 50 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 49 decided bids, it was awarded 22 — a 44.9% win rate — worth ₹4.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Haryana Board Corporation, at 53.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Haryana. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Eloquence Services, GAURAV KUMAR and RAJIV. Eloquence Services bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; S.M. ENTERPRISES won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.