Competitor profile

RUSTAM KHAN

They win 60% of what they bid, and 54% of the value they chase.

5tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
13 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹21.1 L
of ₹38.8 L bid — 54.3% conversion
Win rate
60.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
60.0%
40.0%
Awarded360.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost240.0%
By value₹38.8 L
54.3%
45.7%
Awarded₹21.1 L54.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹17.7 L45.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹21.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S NEETU ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
PRAGYA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ramesh singh1 win · 1 shared tender
₹14.0 L
won head-to-head
04
RAKESH KUMAR YADAV0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SHIV SHAKTI ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RAJENDRA KUMAR YADAV1 win · 1 shared tender
₹3.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRUSTAM KHAN awardedOthers

About RUSTAM KHAN

RUSTAM KHAN appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 60.0% win rate — worth ₹21.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is U.P. State Construction and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd., at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S NEETU ENTERPRISES, PRAGYA ENTERPRISES and ramesh singh. M/S NEETU ENTERPRISES bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; RUSTAM KHAN won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.