Competitor profile

ROYAL ENTERPRISES

They win 25% of what they bid, but only 5% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
23 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.0 L
of ₹74.2 L bid — 5.4% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
25.0%
75.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost375.0%
By value₹74.2 L
94.6%
Awarded₹4.0 L5.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹70.2 L94.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Directorate Urban Administration and Development₹4.0 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Madhya Pradesh₹4.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KAPIL FURNITURE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
DAVIS FURNITURE SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹47.9 L
won head-to-head
03
Growth Marketing0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RAJU KUSHWAH1 win · 1 shared tender
₹13.9 L
won head-to-head
05
LAXMI MAINTENANCE AND ELECTRICAL SERVICES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedROYAL ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to ROYAL ENTERPRISES

About ROYAL ENTERPRISES

ROYAL ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹4.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 12.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KAPIL FURNITURE, DAVIS FURNITURE SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED and Growth Marketing. KAPIL FURNITURE bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; ROYAL ENTERPRISES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.