Competitor profile

Ramesh Kumar Saini-Techno Crat

They win 27% of what they bid, and 37% of the value they chase.

33tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
11 Sept 2013last award
Total bids
33
33 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹46.5 L
of ₹1.3 Cr bid — 36.7% conversion
Win rate
27.3%
of 33 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count33 bids
27.3%
42.4%
30.3%
Awarded927.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1442.4%
Lost1030.3%
By value₹1.3 Cr
36.7%
38.4%
24.9%
Awarded₹46.5 L36.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹48.6 L38.4%
Lost₹31.5 L24.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Delhi Jal Board₹46.5 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹46.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Suresh Sharma-Super System Engineers1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹4.9 L
won head-to-head
02
Ram KUmar Mishra-D M Enterprises1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹89,045
won head-to-head
03
₹11.2 L
won head-to-head
04
₹6.9 L
won head-to-head
05
₹7.5 L
won head-to-head
06
Ved Prakash goel-Pearl Electricals1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹3.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRamesh Kumar awardedOthers

About Ramesh Kumar Saini-Techno Crat

Ramesh Kumar Saini-Techno Crat appears as a bidder on 33 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 33 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 27.3% win rate — worth ₹46.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Sept 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Delhi Jal Board, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Suresh Sharma-Super System Engineers, Ram KUmar Mishra-D M Enterprises and GHANSHYAM DASS-THE SILVERLINE ELECTRO MECHANICAL WORKS. Suresh Sharma-Super System Engineers bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Ramesh Kumar Saini-Techno Crat won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.