Competitor profile

ram singh jamnal-trilok singh ram singh jamnal

They win 25% of what they bid, and 19% of the value they chase.

5tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
19 Dec 2013last award
Total bids
4
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.0 Cr
of ₹10.6 Cr bid — 19.1% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
25.0%
50.0%
25.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected250.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹10.6 Cr
19.1%
44.1%
36.8%
Awarded₹2.0 Cr19.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.7 Cr44.1%
Lost₹3.9 Cr36.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹3.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
KHUSHAL SINGH ADHIKARI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹2.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedram singh jamnal-trilok awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to ram singh jamnal-trilok

About ram singh jamnal-trilok singh ram singh jamnal

ram singh jamnal-trilok singh ram singh jamnal appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹2.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Dec 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Coordinator, PMGSY, Uttarkhand, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Chandra Dutt-M/s Naini Valley Construction, Umesh Chandra Agarwal-Agarwal and CO. and Satish Chandra Pandey-parwatiya construction. Chandra Dutt-M/s Naini Valley Construction bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; ram singh jamnal-trilok singh ram singh jamnal won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.