Competitor profile

Chandra Dutt-M/s Naini Valley Construction

They win 29% of what they bid — and 39% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

10tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
19 Dec 2013last award
Total bids
7
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.2 Cr
of ₹23.8 Cr bid — 38.9% conversion
Win rate
28.6%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
28.6%
71.4%
Awarded228.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected571.4%
Lost00.0%
By value₹23.8 Cr
38.9%
61.1%
Awarded₹9.2 Cr38.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹14.5 Cr61.1%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Umesh Chandra Agarwal-Agarwal and CO.1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
₹2.5 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Ajay Sharma0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
KHUSHAL SINGH ADHIKARI0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedChandra Dutt-M/s awardedOthers

About Chandra Dutt-M/s Naini Valley Construction

Chandra Dutt-M/s Naini Valley Construction appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 28.6% win rate — worth ₹9.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Dec 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Coordinator, PMGSY, Uttarkhand, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against ram singh jamnal-trilok singh ram singh jamnal, Umesh Chandra Agarwal-Agarwal and CO. and Mahesh Kumar Joshi-Super Construction Associates. ram singh jamnal-trilok singh ram singh jamnal bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Chandra Dutt-M/s Naini Valley Construction won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.