Competitor profile

M/S RAM CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 50% of what they bid — and 69% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
10 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹89.1 L
of ₹1.3 Cr bid — 68.6% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
50.0%
25.0%
25.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹1.3 Cr
68.6%
30.5%
Awarded₹89.1 L68.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.1 L0.8%
Lost₹39.6 L30.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹89.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AMAN CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
S R S BUILDCON0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
PRAMOD KUMAR SINGHAL0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MAHALAXMI INFRASTRUCTURE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S ADITYA KUMAR VERMA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹36.0 L
won head-to-head
06
N.G.Constructions0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRAM CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

About M/S RAM CONSTRUCTIONS

M/S RAM CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹89.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Director Cum Chief Engineer RED, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against AMAN CONSTRUCTION, S R S BUILDCON and PRAMOD KUMAR SINGHAL. AMAN CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S RAM CONSTRUCTIONS won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.