Competitor profile

M/S RAJIV SERVICES

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 10% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
1 May 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.9 L
of ₹18.7 L bid — 10.3% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹18.7 L
10.3%
89.7%
Awarded₹1.9 L10.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹16.7 L89.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Haryana Government₹44,20022.9%

Operating states

LowHigh
Haryana₹1.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Atul Enterprises2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹16.6 L
won head-to-head
02
CHOUDHARY SERVICES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
NEW BALAJI CAB SERVICES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
B R CHAUHAN CONTRACTOR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MANOJ KUMAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRAJIV SERVICES awardedOthers

About M/S RAJIV SERVICES

M/S RAJIV SERVICES appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹1.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Haryana Board Corporation, at 77.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Haryana. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Atul Enterprises, CHOUDHARY SERVICES and NEW BALAJI CAB SERVICES. Atul Enterprises bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S RAJIV SERVICES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.