Competitor profile

Rajesh Kumar

They win 46% of what they bid — and 67% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

37tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
15 Jan 2025last award
Total bids
35
37 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
16
16 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.1 Cr
of ₹3.1 Cr bid — 67.4% conversion
Win rate
45.7%
of 35 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count35 bids
45.7%
45.7%
Awarded1645.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected38.6%
Lost1645.7%
By value₹3.1 Cr
67.4%
27.4%
Awarded₹2.1 Cr67.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹16.2 L5.2%
Lost₹86.1 L27.4%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Municipal Corporation₹94.6 L44.7%

Operating states

LowHigh
Chandigarh₹2.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Ms Nain Service Provider0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S Sohan Lal4 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹8.1 L
won head-to-head
03
jai maa enterprises1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹8.9 L
won head-to-head
04
MS VAKEEL YADAV1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹5.3 L
won head-to-head
05
SHUBHAM INFRA DEVELOPER1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹3.1 L
won head-to-head
06
R.K. Construction And Co0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRajesh Kumar awardedOthers

About Rajesh Kumar

Rajesh Kumar appears as a bidder on 37 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 35 decided bids, it was awarded 16 — a 45.7% win rate — worth ₹2.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Jan 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Housing Board, at 55.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Ms Nain Service Provider, M/S Sohan Lal and jai maa enterprises. Ms Nain Service Provider bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Rajesh Kumar won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.