Competitor profile

Rajat Lambat

They win 13% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

15tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
20 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
15
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹23.0 L
of ₹3.7 Cr bid — 6.3% conversion
Win rate
13.3%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count15 bids
13.3%
20.0%
66.7%
Awarded213.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected320.0%
Lost1066.7%
By value₹3.7 Cr
19.0%
74.8%
Awarded₹23.0 L6.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹69.9 L19.0%
Lost₹2.7 Cr74.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹23.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MEETHA NEEM CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Ramnathsingh Chavan0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
KANTHOOJI CONSTRUCTION1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹8.4 L
won head-to-head
04
SUMIRA ENTERPRISES4 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
05
SHRI AKASH SHYAM GANDHEWAR2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹57.6 L
won head-to-head
06
NISHANT YADAV0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRajat Lambat awardedOthers

About Rajat Lambat

Rajat Lambat appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 13.3% win rate — worth ₹23.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MEETHA NEEM CONSTRUCTION, Ramnathsingh Chavan and KANTHOOJI CONSTRUCTION. MEETHA NEEM CONSTRUCTION bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Rajat Lambat won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.