Competitor profile

M/S. RAJ RIYANSH CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 5% of what they bid, and 5% of the value they chase.

138tenders on record
8buyer authorities
1state
17 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
138
138 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
124 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹89.4 L
of ₹18.5 Cr bid — 4.8% conversion
Win rate
5.1%
of 138 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count138 bids
89.9%
Awarded75.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected75.1%
Lost12489.9%
By value₹18.5 Cr
87.4%
Awarded₹89.4 L4.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.4 Cr7.8%
Lost₹16.1 Cr87.4%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Municipal Bodies₹45.8 L51.3%
CE RW I₹11.4 L12.8%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹89.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RASHMI RANJAN PANDA4 wins · 42 shared tenders
₹49.7 L
won head-to-head
02
UTKALIKA MARTHA4 wins · 39 shared tenders
₹36.6 L
won head-to-head
03
DILLIP KUMAR JENA3 wins · 34 shared tenders
₹33.8 L
won head-to-head
04
RANJITA NAYAK0 wins · 30 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Lija Rout5 wins · 29 shared tenders
₹42.9 L
won head-to-head
06
NARESH KUMAR ROUT0 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRAJ RIYANSH awardedOthers

About M/S. RAJ RIYANSH CONSTRUCTIONS

M/S. RAJ RIYANSH CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 138 government tenders on record, from 8 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 138 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 5.1% win rate — worth ₹89.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Municipal Bodies, at 51.3% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against RASHMI RANJAN PANDA, UTKALIKA MARTHA and DILLIP KUMAR JENA. RASHMI RANJAN PANDA bid on 42 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/S. RAJ RIYANSH CONSTRUCTIONS won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.