Competitor profile

Raj Kanwar Aggarwal-The Krishna Construction Co.

They win 8% of what they bid, and 12% of the value they chase.

40tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
20 Sept 2013last award
Total bids
40
40 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
31 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14.0 Cr
of ₹119.1 Cr bid — 11.8% conversion
Win rate
7.5%
of 40 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count40 bids
15.0%
77.5%
Awarded37.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected615.0%
Lost3177.5%
By value₹119.1 Cr
11.8%
79.3%
Awarded₹14.0 Cr11.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.7 Cr9.0%
Lost₹94.4 Cr79.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

DSIIDC₹14.0 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹14.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Rajan Verma4 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹7.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
₹5.6 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Vjay Kumar Gupta1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
04
s n malhotra sons0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
VINOD KUMAR0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Ravinder Kumar -gawar construction ltd2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹4.3 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRaj Kanwar awardedOthers

About Raj Kanwar Aggarwal-The Krishna Construction Co.

Raj Kanwar Aggarwal-The Krishna Construction Co. appears as a bidder on 40 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 40 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 7.5% win rate — worth ₹14.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Sept 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is DSIIDC, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is 9.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Rajan Verma, BHUPENDER KUMAR-DABAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Vjay Kumar Gupta. Rajan Verma bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Raj Kanwar Aggarwal-The Krishna Construction Co. won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.