Competitor profile

Rahmat Construction

They win 33% of what they bid, and 24% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
15 May 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.0 L
of ₹41.7 L bid — 24.0% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded233.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost466.7%
By value₹41.7 L
24.0%
76.0%
Awarded₹10.0 L24.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹31.7 L76.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹10.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAYYAD EJAZUDDIN SAYYAD NIZAMUDDIN2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹10.0 L
won head-to-head
02
MOHD SAJID ABDUL AHAD1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹4.9 L
won head-to-head
03
ARBAZ IBRAHIM KHAN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Ganesh H Chaudhari1 win · 1 shared tender
₹16.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRahmat Construction awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Rahmat Construction

About Rahmat Construction

Rahmat Construction appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹10.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Malegaon Municipal Corporation Malegaon, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAYYAD EJAZUDDIN SAYYAD NIZAMUDDIN, MOHD SAJID ABDUL AHAD and ARBAZ IBRAHIM KHAN. SAYYAD EJAZUDDIN SAYYAD NIZAMUDDIN bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Rahmat Construction won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.