Competitor profile

RADHA BIMALA ENTERPRISE

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 0.1% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
8 Dec 2023last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹28,950
of ₹2.1 Cr bid — 0.1% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected266.7%
Lost00.0%
By value₹2.1 Cr
99.9%
Awarded₹28,9500.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.1 Cr99.9%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
satyam furniture mart0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SAI HANDLOOM INDUSTRIES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
UNITED ENTERPRISE1 win · 1 shared tender
₹28,950
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹10.0 L
won head-to-head
06
ANIL STORES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹28,950
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRADHA BIMALA awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to RADHA BIMALA

About RADHA BIMALA ENTERPRISE

RADHA BIMALA ENTERPRISE appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹28,950 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Dec 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Development Commissioner for Handlooms, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against satyam furniture mart, SAI HANDLOOM INDUSTRIES and UNITED ENTERPRISE. satyam furniture mart bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; RADHA BIMALA ENTERPRISE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.