Competitor profile

RABINDRA KUMAR

They win 51% of what they bid, but only 38% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

65tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
23 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
65
65 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
33
24 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.0 Cr
of ₹2.7 Cr bid — 37.9% conversion
Win rate
50.8%
of 65 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count65 bids
50.8%
12.3%
36.9%
Awarded3350.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected812.3%
Lost2436.9%
By value₹2.7 Cr
37.9%
25.4%
36.7%
Awarded₹1.0 Cr37.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹67.6 L25.4%
Lost₹97.6 L36.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

33 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S AMIT ENTERPRISES7 wins · 35 shared tenders
₹15.8 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S COPIA TECHNOLOGIES7 wins · 28 shared tenders
₹14.3 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S S P YADAV3 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹6.0 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S U.K. SINGH0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S SHRI SHYAM ENTERPRISES1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹2.0 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S T K ENTERPRISES3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹8.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRABINDRA KUMAR awardedOthers

About RABINDRA KUMAR

RABINDRA KUMAR appears as a bidder on 65 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 65 decided bids, it was awarded 33 — a 50.8% win rate — worth ₹1.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Central Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S AMIT ENTERPRISES, M/S COPIA TECHNOLOGIES and M/S S P YADAV. M/S AMIT ENTERPRISES bid on 35 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; RABINDRA KUMAR won 25.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.