Competitor profile

M/S AMIT ENTERPRISES

They win 47% of what they bid, and 45% of the value they chase.

79tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
25 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
79
79 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
37
28 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.3 Cr
of ₹2.8 Cr bid — 45.3% conversion
Win rate
46.8%
of 79 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count79 bids
46.8%
17.7%
35.4%
Awarded3746.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1417.7%
Lost2835.4%
By value₹2.8 Cr
45.3%
21.8%
32.8%
Awarded₹1.3 Cr45.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹60.9 L21.8%
Lost₹91.5 L32.8%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

37 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RABINDRA KUMAR25 wins · 35 shared tenders
₹74.3 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S S P YADAV2 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹4.1 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S G.K ENTERPRISES2 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹14.7 L
won head-to-head
04
M/s M K Engineering Works3 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹22.1 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S COPIA TECHNOLOGIES4 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹8.9 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S JUGA WELDING WORKS2 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹5.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMIT ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About M/S AMIT ENTERPRISES

M/S AMIT ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 79 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 79 decided bids, it was awarded 37 — a 46.8% win rate — worth ₹1.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Eastern Coalfields Limited, at 79.4% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against RABINDRA KUMAR, M/S S P YADAV and M/S G.K ENTERPRISES. RABINDRA KUMAR bid on 35 of the same tenders and won 25 of them; M/S AMIT ENTERPRISES won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.