Competitor profile

QULITY CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS

They win 57% of what they bid, and 64% of the value they chase.

35tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
7 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
35
35 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
20
15 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.1 Cr
of ₹3.4 Cr bid — 63.7% conversion
Win rate
57.1%
of 35 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count35 bids
57.1%
42.9%
Awarded2057.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1542.9%
By value₹3.4 Cr
63.7%
36.3%
Awarded₹2.1 Cr63.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.2 Cr36.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹2.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Shri. Suryakant Dnyaneshwar Shete0 wins · 34 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S BHAIRAVNATH CONSTRUCTION12 wins · 34 shared tenders
₹94.0 L
won head-to-head
03
VIJAY DNYANU SONNUR0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Aditya Balkrushan Thaware0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
BALASAHEB VISHNU JAGDALE0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
DIPAK DAJI PATIL0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedQULITY CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About QULITY CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS

QULITY CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS appears as a bidder on 35 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 35 decided bids, it was awarded 20 — a 57.1% win rate — worth ₹2.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Shri. Suryakant Dnyaneshwar Shete, M/S BHAIRAVNATH CONSTRUCTION and VIJAY DNYANU SONNUR. Shri. Suryakant Dnyaneshwar Shete bid on 34 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; QULITY CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS won 20.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.