Competitor profile

PUSPA CONSTRUCTION

They win 20% of what they bid — and 41% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

15tenders on record
7buyer authorities
1state
1 Dec 2026last award
Total bids
15
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.9 Cr
of ₹4.7 Cr bid — 41.2% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count15 bids
20.0%
73.3%
Awarded320.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected16.7%
Lost1173.3%
By value₹4.7 Cr
41.2%
58.2%
Awarded₹1.9 Cr41.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.1 L0.7%
Lost₹2.7 Cr58.2%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹3.5 L1.8%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹1.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KUHELI ENTERPRISE0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
ARADHYA CONSTRUCTION4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹7.7 L
won head-to-head
03
SANDIP MAITY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SUBRATA MAITY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SURAJ ENTERPRISE & SUPPLIERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ANJALI CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹97.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPUSPA CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to PUSPA CONSTRUCTION

About PUSPA CONSTRUCTION

PUSPA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 7 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹1.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Dec 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is IRRIGATION AND WATERWAYS DEPT., at 97.1% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KUHELI ENTERPRISE, ARADHYA CONSTRUCTION and SANDIP MAITY. KUHELI ENTERPRISE bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; PUSPA CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.