Competitor profile

M/S PURNEA CONSTRUCTION

They win 10% of what they bid, and 7% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
13 Oct 2025last award
Total bids
10
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.6 Cr
of ₹75.7 Cr bid — 7.3% conversion
Win rate
10.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
10.0%
10.0%
80.0%
Awarded110.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected110.0%
Lost880.0%
By value₹75.7 Cr
30.7%
62.0%
Awarded₹5.6 Cr7.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹23.2 Cr30.7%
Lost₹46.9 Cr62.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHRI NAVAL KISHOR1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹12.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
DHANANJAY KUMAR SINGH0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MADAN KUMAR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s Payal COnstruction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Jaya Anavar0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Arti Kumari1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹7.4 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPURNEA CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to PURNEA CONSTRUCTION

About M/S PURNEA CONSTRUCTION

M/S PURNEA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 10.0% win rate — worth ₹5.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Oct 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rural Works Department - Bihar, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHRI NAVAL KISHOR, DHANANJAY KUMAR SINGH and MADAN KUMAR. SHRI NAVAL KISHOR bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S PURNEA CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.