Competitor profile

M/s Payal COnstruction

They win 33% of what they bid, and 42% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
15 Jul 2025last award
Total bids
3
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.6 Cr
of ₹15.8 Cr bid — 41.8% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹15.8 Cr
41.8%
58.2%
Awarded₹6.6 Cr41.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹9.2 Cr58.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Sumit Kumar Singh1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹5.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S PURNEA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SWAPNIL KUMAR SINGH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Dip Narayan Roy0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
PRAVIN KUMAR PRASUH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPayal COnstruction awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Payal COnstruction

About M/s Payal COnstruction

M/s Payal COnstruction appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹6.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Jul 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rural Works Department - Bihar, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Sumit Kumar Singh, M/S PURNEA CONSTRUCTION and JAI BABA DHANKUND NATH CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED. Sumit Kumar Singh bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/s Payal COnstruction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.