Competitor profile

Pulse Fitness

They win 25% of what they bid — and 40% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
6 Nov 2025last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.3 L
of ₹15.6 L bid — 40.4% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
25.0%
75.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected375.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹15.6 L
40.4%
59.6%
Awarded₹6.3 L40.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹9.3 L59.6%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹6.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
United Marketing Sports Emporium0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Vigil Equipments & Clothing0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
₹9.3 L
won head-to-head
04
EXCEL ENGINEERS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
EXCEL CARE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
worldvision0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPulse Fitness awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Pulse Fitness

About Pulse Fitness

Pulse Fitness appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹6.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 6 Nov 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Kerala Small Industries Development Corporation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against United Marketing Sports Emporium, Vigil Equipments & Clothing and Lanoviz Security Solutions Private Limited. United Marketing Sports Emporium bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Pulse Fitness won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.