Competitor profile

M/S. Pritam Construction

They win 92% of what they bid, but only 72% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

25tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
28 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
25
25 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
23
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.7 Cr
of ₹3.7 Cr bid — 72.0% conversion
Win rate
92.0%
of 25 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count25 bids
92.0%
Awarded2392.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost28.0%
By value₹3.7 Cr
72.0%
28.0%
Awarded₹2.7 Cr72.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.0 Cr28.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹2.7 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S. Arth Enterprises0 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
RAHUL ENTERPRISES0 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
S.K.ENTERPRISES0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Devika Construction0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
jha p and compony0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
S A Enterprises0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPritam Construction awardedOthers

About M/S. Pritam Construction

M/S. Pritam Construction appears as a bidder on 25 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 25 decided bids, it was awarded 23 — a 92.0% win rate — worth ₹2.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S. Arth Enterprises, RAHUL ENTERPRISES and S.K.ENTERPRISES. M/S. Arth Enterprises bid on 15 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S. Pritam Construction won 15.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.