Competitor profile

PRERNA DEVELOPERS

They win 13% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
23 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.2 Cr
of ₹12.3 Cr bid — 18.3% conversion
Win rate
12.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count8 bids
12.5%
75.0%
12.5%
Awarded112.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected675.0%
Lost112.5%
By value₹12.3 Cr
18.3%
78.7%
Awarded₹2.2 Cr18.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹9.6 Cr78.7%
Lost₹37.3 L3.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹2.2 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹2.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
R N Lanjile Construction3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
PATEL CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Manoj Balaji More0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
LAXMI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/s.Shree Samarth Construction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S LALIT BUILDER0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPRERNA DEVELOPERS awardedOthers

About PRERNA DEVELOPERS

PRERNA DEVELOPERS appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 12.5% win rate — worth ₹2.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against R N Lanjile Construction, PATEL CONSTRUCTION and Manoj Balaji More. R N Lanjile Construction bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; PRERNA DEVELOPERS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.