Competitor profile

prativa construction

They win 11% of what they bid, and 9% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹44.5 L
of ₹4.9 Cr bid — 9.0% conversion
Win rate
11.1%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
11.1%
55.6%
33.3%
Awarded111.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected555.6%
Lost333.3%
By value₹4.9 Cr
58.7%
32.3%
Awarded₹44.5 L9.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.9 Cr58.7%
Lost₹1.6 Cr32.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹44.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAHAR ALI0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Provat Pegu2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹93.7 L
won head-to-head
03
N K Construction and Suppliers0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S M.Bee Traders0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S TINI VAI SUPPLY AND CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BHARGAB JYOTI PEGU0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedprativa construction awardedOthers

About prativa construction

prativa construction appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 11.1% win rate — worth ₹44.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Health Mission, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAHAR ALI, Provat Pegu and N K Construction and Suppliers. SAHAR ALI bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; prativa construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.