Competitor profile

PRATIMA CONSTRUCTION

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 12% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

24tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
25 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
24
24 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹36.5 L
of ₹3.0 Cr bid — 12.0% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 24 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count24 bids
33.3%
25.0%
41.7%
Awarded833.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected625.0%
Lost1041.7%
By value₹3.0 Cr
12.0%
68.8%
19.2%
Awarded₹36.5 L12.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.1 Cr68.8%
Lost₹58.4 L19.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PHE₹33.0 L90.3%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹36.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
A.R. TRADERS6 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹22.4 L
won head-to-head
02
MUKHERJEE ENTERPRISE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ARDHENDU PAL0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
EMERALD0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
S. K. DHAR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPRATIMA CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About PRATIMA CONSTRUCTION

PRATIMA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 24 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 24 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹36.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PHE, at 90.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against A.R. TRADERS, MUKHERJEE ENTERPRISE and ARDHENDU PAL. A.R. TRADERS bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; PRATIMA CONSTRUCTION won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.