Competitor profile

PRATHMESH KISHOR GHAVTE

They win 17% of what they bid, and 12% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
23 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹32.1 L
of ₹2.7 Cr bid — 12.0% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
83.3%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost583.3%
By value₹2.7 Cr
12.0%
88.0%
Awarded₹32.1 L12.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.4 Cr88.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹32.1 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹32.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
LEKHRAJ KAILASH PANDIT1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹9.4 L
won head-to-head
02
AMOL SUNIL DAHIDE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹24.6 L
won head-to-head
03
AKSHAY SUNIL GULAVE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Krishnakant Murlidhar Khond0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Bhausaheb Uttamrao Sonawane0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
NITIN D HINDURAO0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPRATHMESH KISHOR awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to PRATHMESH KISHOR

About PRATHMESH KISHOR GHAVTE

PRATHMESH KISHOR GHAVTE appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹32.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 12.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against LEKHRAJ KAILASH PANDIT, AMOL SUNIL DAHIDE and AKSHAY SUNIL GULAVE. LEKHRAJ KAILASH PANDIT bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; PRATHMESH KISHOR GHAVTE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.