Competitor profile

prasad chapke-prasad pralhadrao chapke

They win 50% of what they bid, and 56% of the value they chase.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
7 Mar 2013last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹20.3 L
of ₹36.2 L bid — 56.1% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹36.2 L
56.1%
43.9%
Awarded₹20.3 L56.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹15.9 L43.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

CE-MRRDA₹20.3 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Datta Chapke-D.N.Chapke1 win · 1 shared tender
₹15.2 L
won head-to-head
03
Mohammad Ismail Mohammad Ibrahim0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Sk.Nazir Sk.Vazir-R K CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedprasad chapke-prasad awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to prasad chapke-prasad

About prasad chapke-prasad pralhadrao chapke

prasad chapke-prasad pralhadrao chapke appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹20.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Mar 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE-MRRDA, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Kadam Indarrao Baburao-New Rameshwar Construction co., Datta Chapke-D.N.Chapke and Mohammad Ismail Mohammad Ibrahim. Kadam Indarrao Baburao-New Rameshwar Construction co. bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; prasad chapke-prasad pralhadrao chapke won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.