Competitor profile

Mohammad Ismail Mohammad Ibrahim

They win 29% of what they bid, and 30% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
26 Feb 2014last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹58.9 L
of ₹1.9 Cr bid — 30.4% conversion
Win rate
28.6%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count14 bids
28.6%
21.4%
50.0%
Awarded428.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected321.4%
Lost750.0%
By value₹1.9 Cr
30.4%
20.2%
49.4%
Awarded₹58.9 L30.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹39.1 L20.2%
Lost₹95.7 L49.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

CE-MRRDA₹58.9 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RUGLE V V-rugle v v0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
₹31.9 L
won head-to-head
03
SAYYAD CONSTRUCTION3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹46.8 L
won head-to-head
04
Alfia Enterprises0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Sudhakar-M/s. Pallavi Construction2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹10.0 L
won head-to-head
06
prasad pralhadrao chapke0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMohammad Ismail awardedOthers

About Mohammad Ismail Mohammad Ibrahim

Mohammad Ismail Mohammad Ibrahim appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 28.6% win rate — worth ₹58.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Feb 2014.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE-MRRDA, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RUGLE V V-rugle v v, Tushar Jalindar Deshmukh-M/s Anusaya construction company and SAYYAD CONSTRUCTION. RUGLE V V-rugle v v bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Mohammad Ismail Mohammad Ibrahim won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.