Competitor profile

PRAMOD KUMAR

They win 22% of what they bid, and 29% of the value they chase.

78tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
20 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
77
78 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
35 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹46.2 Cr
of ₹161.4 Cr bid — 28.6% conversion
Win rate
22.1%
of 77 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count77 bids
22.1%
32.5%
45.5%
Awarded1722.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2532.5%
Lost3545.5%
By value₹161.4 Cr
28.6%
35.1%
36.2%
Awarded₹46.2 Cr28.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹56.7 Cr35.1%
Lost₹58.5 Cr36.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹46.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Mahalaxmi Construction4 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹9.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Ms Lokesh Kathayat4 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹3.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S L. R. TANEJA CONTRACTOR3 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹5.3 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/s Suresh Kumar Jain1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
05
SANJAY AGARWAL0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S Sharma construction1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPRAMOD KUMAR awardedOthers

About PRAMOD KUMAR

PRAMOD KUMAR appears as a bidder on 78 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 77 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 22.1% win rate — worth ₹46.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 84.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Mahalaxmi Construction, Ms Lokesh Kathayat and M/S L. R. TANEJA CONTRACTOR. M/s Mahalaxmi Construction bid on 21 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; PRAMOD KUMAR won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.