Competitor profile

M/S L. R. TANEJA CONTRACTOR

They win 27% of what they bid, and 35% of the value they chase.

27tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
1 Feb 2024last award
Total bids
26
27 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
13 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹10.2 Cr
of ₹29.6 Cr bid — 34.6% conversion
Win rate
26.9%
of 26 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count26 bids
26.9%
23.1%
50.0%
Awarded726.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected623.1%
Lost1350.0%
By value₹29.6 Cr
34.6%
26.9%
38.5%
Awarded₹10.2 Cr34.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.0 Cr26.9%
Lost₹11.4 Cr38.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹10.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PRAMOD KUMAR2 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Data Technosys(Engineerrs) Pvt. Ltd.1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹2.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
shri Ram Construction0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Mahesh Verma Constructions0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/s Suresh Kumar Jain1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹32.1 L
won head-to-head
06
M/s Royal Construction0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedL. R. TANEJA awardedOthers

About M/S L. R. TANEJA CONTRACTOR

M/S L. R. TANEJA CONTRACTOR appears as a bidder on 27 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 26 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 26.9% win rate — worth ₹10.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Feb 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against PRAMOD KUMAR, Data Technosys(Engineerrs) Pvt. Ltd. and shri Ram Construction. PRAMOD KUMAR bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S L. R. TANEJA CONTRACTOR won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.