Competitor profile

PATIT MAHATA

They win 14% of what they bid — and 25% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
20 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.5 L
of ₹14.2 L bid — 24.6% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
85.7%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost685.7%
By value₹14.2 L
24.6%
75.4%
Awarded₹3.5 L24.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹10.7 L75.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹3.5 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹3.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BABULAL MAHATA1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹3.5 L
won head-to-head
02
SUSHIL PAL3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹1.5 L
won head-to-head
03
SAMIK SHYAMAL1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.5 L
won head-to-head
04
CHITTA RANJAN MAHATA0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
BHUPENDRA NATH MAHATA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPATIT MAHATA awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to PATIT MAHATA

About PATIT MAHATA

PATIT MAHATA appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹3.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zilla Parishad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against BABULAL MAHATA, SUSHIL PAL and SAMIK SHYAMAL. BABULAL MAHATA bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; PATIT MAHATA won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.