Competitor profile

M/s Parth and Associate

They win 8% of what they bid, and 4% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
3 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
13
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹37.5 Cr bid — 4.3% conversion
Win rate
7.7%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count13 bids
15.4%
76.9%
Awarded17.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected215.4%
Lost1076.9%
By value₹37.5 Cr
18.1%
77.6%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr4.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.8 Cr18.1%
Lost₹29.1 Cr77.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹1.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S KAUSHAL KUMAR SINGH2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹11.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S CHHATRA SHAKTI ASSOCIATES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S SINGH CONSTRUCTION3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹5.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S BHARAT TIWARI0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S JAI MAA DURGA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹45.6 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S OBELION CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹4.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedParth and Associate awardedOthers

About M/s Parth and Associate

M/s Parth and Associate appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 7.7% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is U P Irrigation Department (Civil), at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S KAUSHAL KUMAR SINGH, M/S CHHATRA SHAKTI ASSOCIATES and M/S SINGH CONSTRUCTION. M/S KAUSHAL KUMAR SINGH bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/s Parth and Associate won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.