Competitor profile

paranjape construction

They win 17% of what they bid, and 20% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
10 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹48.8 L
of ₹2.5 Cr bid — 19.6% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
33.3%
50.0%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected233.3%
Lost350.0%
By value₹2.5 Cr
19.6%
46.0%
34.4%
Awarded₹48.8 L19.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.1 Cr46.0%
Lost₹85.6 L34.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹48.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MEHAR VASANT PADTE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Chandrakant Ganpat Bile0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
AVADHUT GURUNATH NARVEKAR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
OMKAR ANIL WALKE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Sairanga Construction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ANISNAIK2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹74.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedparanjape construction awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to paranjape construction

About paranjape construction

paranjape construction appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹48.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MEHAR VASANT PADTE, Chandrakant Ganpat Bile and AVADHUT GURUNATH NARVEKAR. MEHAR VASANT PADTE bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; paranjape construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.