Competitor profile

M/S PANKAJ SHARMA

They win 17% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
12 Aug 2025last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹7.5 Cr bid — 16.4% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
33.3%
50.0%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected233.3%
Lost350.0%
By value₹7.5 Cr
16.4%
25.8%
57.8%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr16.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.9 Cr25.8%
Lost₹4.3 Cr57.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

NREP WEST SINGHBHUM₹1.2 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹1.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NEPAL MAHTO0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S ADITYA INFRASTRUCTURE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SHREE SAI INFRASTRUCTURE1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S SANKHUBABA TRADERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
NANDLAL KUMAR GUPTA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/s. Vimesh Singh0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPANKAJ SHARMA awardedOthers

About M/S PANKAJ SHARMA

M/S PANKAJ SHARMA appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Aug 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is NREP WEST SINGHBHUM, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NEPAL MAHTO, M/S ADITYA INFRASTRUCTURE and SHREE SAI INFRASTRUCTURE. NEPAL MAHTO bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S PANKAJ SHARMA won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.