Competitor profile

NANDLAL KUMAR GUPTA

They win 60% of what they bid, but only 48% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

5tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
12 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.1 Cr
of ₹4.4 Cr bid — 47.7% conversion
Win rate
60.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
60.0%
40.0%
Awarded360.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost240.0%
By value₹4.4 Cr
47.7%
52.3%
Awarded₹2.1 Cr47.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.3 Cr52.3%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

NREP WEST SINGHBHUM₹1.2 Cr59.8%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹2.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S ADITYA INFRASTRUCTURE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SHREE SAI INFRASTRUCTURE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S SANKHUBABA TRADERS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
BHATIA COMMUNICATION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S OM CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
NEPAL MAHTO0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNANDLAL KUMAR awardedOthers

About NANDLAL KUMAR GUPTA

NANDLAL KUMAR GUPTA appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 60.0% win rate — worth ₹2.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is NREP WEST SINGHBHUM, at 59.8% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S ADITYA INFRASTRUCTURE, SHREE SAI INFRASTRUCTURE and M/S SANKHUBABA TRADERS. M/S ADITYA INFRASTRUCTURE bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; NANDLAL KUMAR GUPTA won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.