Competitor profile

m.s.padmavati construction

They win 13% of what they bid, and 8% of the value they chase.

89tenders on record
8buyer authorities
1state
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
84
89 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
11
56 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.1 Cr
of ₹78.6 Cr bid — 7.7% conversion
Win rate
13.1%
of 84 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count84 bids
13.1%
20.2%
66.7%
Awarded1113.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1720.2%
Lost5666.7%
By value₹78.6 Cr
47.3%
45.0%
Awarded₹6.1 Cr7.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹37.2 Cr47.3%
Lost₹35.3 Cr45.0%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RDD-CEO-PUNE₹1.7 Cr27.6%
Public Works Region₹12.5 L2.1%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹6.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S MORYA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 36 shared tenders
₹93.8 L
won head-to-head
02
GAIKWAD AKSHAY RAMCHANDRA4 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Om Enterprises1 win · 17 shared tenders
₹61.0 L
won head-to-head
04
Prashant Sudam Dhotre1 win · 17 shared tenders
₹79.3 L
won head-to-head
05
NK INFRA0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S. D M WABLE INFRA3 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedm.s.padmavati awardedOthers

About m.s.padmavati construction

m.s.padmavati construction appears as a bidder on 89 government tenders on record, from 8 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 84 decided bids, it was awarded 11 — a 13.1% win rate — worth ₹6.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region-Pune, at 70.3% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S MORYA CONSTRUCTION, GAIKWAD AKSHAY RAMCHANDRA and Om Enterprises. M/S MORYA CONSTRUCTION bid on 36 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; m.s.padmavati construction won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.