Competitor profile

PADAM CHAND JAIN-SHRI SHYAM TUBEWELL CO

They win 83% of what they bid, and 85% of the value they chase.

36tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
1 Oct 2013last award
Total bids
35
36 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
29
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹29.4 Cr
of ₹34.7 Cr bid — 84.7% conversion
Win rate
82.9%
of 35 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count35 bids
82.9%
14.3%
Awarded2982.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected12.9%
Lost514.3%
By value₹34.7 Cr
84.7%
12.1%
Awarded₹29.4 Cr84.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.1 Cr3.1%
Lost₹4.2 Cr12.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹29.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹3.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
SarwanKumar Mali5 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹4.8 Cr
won head-to-head
03
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Anil Kumar Agarwal0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Bhawar lal Jangid0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPADAM CHAND awardedOthers

About PADAM CHAND JAIN-SHRI SHYAM TUBEWELL CO

PADAM CHAND JAIN-SHRI SHYAM TUBEWELL CO appears as a bidder on 36 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 35 decided bids, it was awarded 29 — a 82.9% win rate — worth ₹29.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PHED-Chief Engineer(HQ),Jaipur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against VIKRAM SINGH-M/S VIKRAM ENGINEERING WORKS, SarwanKumar Mali and LAKHPAT SINGH-M/S SUSHIL CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING WORKS. VIKRAM SINGH-M/S VIKRAM ENGINEERING WORKS bid on 14 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; PADAM CHAND JAIN-SHRI SHYAM TUBEWELL CO won 9.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.