Competitor profile

Anil Kumar Agarwal

They win 9% of what they bid — and 22% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

11tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
20 May 2013last award
Total bids
11
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.9 Cr
of ₹17.9 Cr bid — 21.8% conversion
Win rate
9.1%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count11 bids
63.6%
27.3%
Awarded19.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected763.6%
Lost327.3%
By value₹17.9 Cr
21.8%
32.3%
45.9%
Awarded₹3.9 Cr21.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.8 Cr32.3%
Lost₹8.2 Cr45.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹3.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PADAM CHAND JAIN-SHRI SHYAM TUBEWELL CO4 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹3.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
RAM SINGH PACHAR-m/s pacharandcompany0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
HABIB ALI-M/s Sheikh Construction1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Rajendra Singh1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAnil Kumar awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Anil Kumar

About Anil Kumar Agarwal

Anil Kumar Agarwal appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 9.1% win rate — worth ₹3.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 May 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PHED-Chief Engineer(HQ),Jaipur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against PADAM CHAND JAIN-SHRI SHYAM TUBEWELL CO, RAM SINGH PACHAR-m/s pacharandcompany and VIKRAM SINGH-M/S VIKRAM ENGINEERING WORKS. PADAM CHAND JAIN-SHRI SHYAM TUBEWELL CO bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Anil Kumar Agarwal won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.