Competitor profile

OM TRADING CO.

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 0% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
2 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2
of ₹14.1 L bid — 0.0% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹14.1 L
100.0%
Awarded₹20.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹14.1 L100.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹2

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NARAIN JI TRADERS2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹2
won head-to-head
02
CHAWLA TRADING COMPANY1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
03
Modern Kamboj Seeds1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1
won head-to-head
04
DEEPAK INDUSTRIES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SETHI TRADING CO.1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1
won head-to-head
06
GARG INDUSTRIES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2,555
won head-to-head
Rival awardedOM TRADING awardedOthers

About OM TRADING CO.

OM TRADING CO. appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹2 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Agriculture, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is 13.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NARAIN JI TRADERS, CHAWLA TRADING COMPANY and Modern Kamboj Seeds. NARAIN JI TRADERS bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; OM TRADING CO. won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.