Competitor profile

OM KAILAS KOTHARKAR

They win 14% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
5 May 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹15.7 L
of ₹98.1 L bid — 16.0% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
85.7%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost685.7%
By value₹98.1 L
16.0%
84.0%
Awarded₹15.7 L16.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹82.4 L84.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹15.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Sunil Ganpat Padyar2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹32.2 L
won head-to-head
02
Dipak Vinayak Gurav1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹12.0 L
won head-to-head
03
LALIT CHARUDATTA KADAM2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹22.9 L
won head-to-head
04
SANDESH SANJAY MESTRI1 win · 1 shared tender
₹12.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedOM KAILAS KOTHARKAR awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to OM KAILAS KOTHARKAR

About OM KAILAS KOTHARKAR

OM KAILAS KOTHARKAR appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹15.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Sunil Ganpat Padyar, Dipak Vinayak Gurav and LALIT CHARUDATTA KADAM. Sunil Ganpat Padyar bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; OM KAILAS KOTHARKAR won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.