Competitor profile

OM INDUSTRIES

They win 50% of what they bid — and 65% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
1 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹23.3 L
of ₹35.9 L bid — 64.7% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹35.9 L
64.7%
35.3%
Awarded₹23.3 L64.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹12.7 L35.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
lakshmi engineering works2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹15.4 L
won head-to-head
02
Prayag Engineering And Equipments0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SRT Engineering Service0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ISPAT SILPA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.9 L
won head-to-head
05
WIPERDRIVE ENGINEERING0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
PRECISION TOOLS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedOM INDUSTRIES awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to OM INDUSTRIES

About OM INDUSTRIES

OM INDUSTRIES appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹23.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Madras Fertilizers Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against lakshmi engineering works, Prayag Engineering And Equipments and SRT Engineering Service. lakshmi engineering works bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; OM INDUSTRIES won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.