Competitor profile

lakshmi engineering works

They win 29% of what they bid, and 20% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
15 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹32.5 L
of ₹1.7 Cr bid — 19.6% conversion
Win rate
28.6%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count14 bids
28.6%
64.3%
Awarded428.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected17.1%
Lost964.3%
By value₹1.7 Cr
19.6%
79.1%
Awarded₹32.5 L19.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.2 L1.3%
Lost₹1.3 Cr79.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SRT Engineering Service0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
ISPAT SILPA2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹10.3 L
won head-to-head
03
OM INDUSTRIES2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹23.3 L
won head-to-head
04
OVERSEAS TRADE AND COMMERCE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹3.7 L
won head-to-head
05
USHA ENGINEERING WORKS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹17.9 L
won head-to-head
06
ELMA INTERNATIONAL0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedlakshmi engineering awardedOthers

About lakshmi engineering works

lakshmi engineering works appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 28.6% win rate — worth ₹32.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Madras Fertilizers Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 26.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SRT Engineering Service, ISPAT SILPA and OM INDUSTRIES. SRT Engineering Service bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; lakshmi engineering works won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.